War against the Islamic State

Analyze the complex international military coalition formed to combat the Islamic State's territorial ambitions and brutal ideology, examining its strategic successes and enduring challenges.

Images

Grumman F-14 Tomcat

Grumman F-14 Tomcat

openverse
kurdish-peshmerga-troops-take-part-intensive-security-deployment-against-islamic-state
Voices of Diversity, January 17th, 2007
Voices of Diversity, January 17th, 2007
20180116_Philippines_2453 Manila sRGB
Hashed al-Shaabi soldier in war with DAESH in Saladin Governorate (1)
Stop Turkey's war on the Kurdish people - Rally against Turkish attacks against Kurds fighting Islamic State
“Bannon’s suggestions that Islam is an inferior religion that needs to be defeated in war for the soul of the West is not about religion; it is an ideological justification for systematic war, expulsion, and worse.” ―Roger Berkowitz
“But Bannon is not talking about the Islamic religion; his target is not Islam but the demonization of Islam as a means to justify a war that would reinvigorate American nationalism.” ―Roger Berkowitz 🎲
20180116_Philippines_2377 Manila sRGB
Khalid ibn al-Walid's Ridda campaign
20180116_Philippines_2450 Manila sRGB

Genesis of a Caliphate and International Response

The emergence of the Islamic State (IS) as a formidable territorial force, particularly following its 2014 invasion of Iraq, triggered a significant international military intervention. This response was galvanized by IS's universally condemned executions, systematic human rights abuses, and the palpable fear of wider regional destabilization stemming from the Syrian civil war. The group's rapid territorial gains and brutal ideology presented a direct challenge to international norms and security.

This led to a diverse array of states, often with divergent geopolitical interests, coalescing into a de facto coalition to counter IS's expansion and influence, extending even to minor interventions against IS-affiliated groups in Nigeria and Libya.

A Patchwork Coalition

The military campaign against IS was characterized by a complex web of international cooperation, often involving unlikely allies. In June 2014, the United States and Iran, despite their deep-seated animosity, both began operations in Iraq against IS, with the US deploying troops and conducting airstrikes, and Iran reportedly sending drones and soldiers. Iran also supplied aircraft to Iraq and reportedly facilitated support for Shia militias.

The US spearheaded a coalition that, by September 2014, included fourteen countries executing airstrikes in Iraq and Syria, working closely with nations like Saudi Arabia and Jordan. Russia's intervention in Syria in September 2015, ostensibly to fight IS, primarily served to bolster the Assad regime, often targeting Syrian opposition groups rather than IS itself, highlighting the varied strategic objectives within the broader anti-IS effort.

Military Operations and Shifting Frontlines

The sustained aerial campaigns and ground support provided by the coalition proved effective in degrading IS's capabilities. The US-led coalition actively trained and equipped Syrian Kurdish and secular militias, who played a crucial role in pushing IS back. Following the commencement of these air campaigns, IS began to lose significant ground in both Iraq and Syria.

However, these operations were not without cost; civilian casualties from airstrikes became a tragic consequence in 2015 and 2016. Despite initial plans for coordination, direct US-Russian cooperation on airstrikes did not materialize, reflecting the complex geopolitical landscape.

Degradation, Defeat, and Enduring Threat

By December 2017, IS had been largely expelled from Iraq, and by March 2019, its territorial defeat in Syria was declared with the fall of Baghuz Fawqani. This marked the end of IS as a territorial entity, forcing it into an insurgency. The death of its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, in a US raid in October 2019, followed by the succession of Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurashi, signaled a shift in the group's structure.

Despite these significant setbacks, the United Nations estimated in August 2020 that over 10,000 IS fighters remained active, primarily as sleeper cells, demonstrating the persistent challenge of eradicating extremist networks and the long-term implications for regional and global security.

See also

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the Islamic State and why did many countries want to stop it?+
The Islamic State was a group that took over land in Iraq and Syria and did many bad things. Many countries worked together to fight it and keep people safe.
How did the United States and Iran help fight the Islamic State even though they usually don't get along?+
The United States sent troops and airstrikes, while Iran sent drones, soldiers, and aircraft to help Iraq. They worked together to stop the group.
Why did the coalition use airstrikes and training for local fighters?+
Airstrikes helped take back land from the group. Training local Kurdish and other militias gave them the tools to fight on the ground.
When did the Islamic State lose its control over Iraq and Syria?+
By December 2017 it was mostly gone from Iraq, and in March 2019 it was defeated in Syria after the last stronghold fell.
Are there still people who might be part of the Islamic State after it lost its territory?+
Yes, in 2020 the UN said more than 10,000 fighters were still active as sleeper cells, meaning the danger can still exist.
Was this helpful?
W

Based on content from Wikipedia · Licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0